![]() ![]() Also, keep in mind that 1975 was the absolute worst of the emissions-laden low-performance American automobiles. It's an economy car with some sporty styling touches. Well, your first problem is in thinking that the Maverick is a "sports car". How can a sports car with a bigger engine be slower than a beat up old volvo? I'd like to know in case of a zombie apocalypse, that I can do better than 19 seconds to 60, and top off a little higher than 80 mph. It's not that I plan on racing or abusing these cars, but. But the numbers for the Maverick are really surprising to me, someone let me know if that's accurate. Much more reasonable but still, I'd think you could push an engine of that size farther than some volvo brick. Similar question to a 1965 Impala Sport Sedan 327 V8 I'm looking at, 0-60 is over 11 seconds, top speed 109 mph. Is this true or realistic? My 1984 Volvo 4-cyl engine, non turbo, had a 0-60 of about 14 seconds, and I personally drove it to 115 mph. Automobile Catalog lists this car as having 0-60 times between 18 and 19 seconds, and top speeds between 80-90 mph. ![]() I came across a nice deal on a 1975 Ford Maverick Grabber, but then upon looking into the specs for the inline 6 version I'm seeing some numbers I can't believe for such a sporty looking car. As some of you may know, I'm looking for my first classic car. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |